Back to Insights
LeadershipFinancial Services

Succession planning in financial services: the hidden risk on every board agenda

Regulatory scrutiny of succession planning has increased significantly in recent years, yet many financial services firms still treat it as a compliance exercise rather than a strategic priority. We examine what genuine succession planning looks like - and why it matters more than ever.

Matt Oliver

Founding Partner

January 2026
6 min read

Succession planning sits at the intersection of governance, risk management, and talent strategy. In financial services, it also sits squarely in the regulatory spotlight. The PRA and FCA have been increasingly explicit about their expectations for succession planning at senior management level - and their scrutiny extends well beyond the formal requirements of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime.

The compliance trap

Many financial services firms have responded to regulatory pressure by treating succession planning as a compliance exercise. They maintain succession charts, identify potential successors for key roles, and report to the board on succession readiness. This satisfies the regulatory requirement. It does not constitute genuine succession planning.

The difference between compliance succession planning and genuine succession planning lies in what happens between the annual review. Genuine succession planning is a continuous process of identifying, developing, and testing potential leaders - creating the conditions in which successors are genuinely ready when they are needed, rather than simply identified.

"A succession plan that sits in a drawer until the regulator asks for it is not a succession plan. It is a risk that has been documented rather than managed."

Why it matters more than ever

The pace of change in financial services - regulatory, technological, and competitive - means that the leadership requirements of senior roles are evolving faster than at any point in recent history. A successor who was identified as ready three years ago may not be the right person for the role as it exists today. Succession planning that does not account for this evolution is planning for the past, not the future.

What genuine succession planning looks like

  • Role profiles that reflect future requirements, not just current ones
  • Development plans that are specific, stretching, and actively managed
  • Regular exposure of potential successors to board and senior stakeholders
  • Honest assessment of readiness gaps and credible plans to close them
  • A pipeline that extends beyond the immediate successor to the next generation of leaders
  • Board ownership of succession for the CEO and direct reports, with executive ownership below

Firms that get succession planning right do not just reduce regulatory risk. They create a leadership pipeline that is a genuine competitive advantage - attracting ambitious leaders who can see a credible path to the top, and retaining them through the development investment that genuine succession planning requires.

MO

Matt Oliver

Founding Partner, Stratos Consulting Ltd

Matt is the Founding Partner of Stratos Consulting Ltd, with over 25 years of experience across financial services, public sector, and healthcare. He has served as CTO and Managing Director of a management consultancy business.

Speak with our team

If the themes in this article resonate with challenges your organisation is facing, we would welcome the conversation.

Get in touch